KRQE News 13 Senate Debate: Part 3

THIS.
ENERGY IS ALWAYS A BIG --
AN ISSUE AND LIKE MANY ISSUES,
IT SEEMS THE DIFFERENCES ARE
SHARP AND THE SOLUTIONS ARE
SOMEWHERE IN BETWEEN.
WHAT DO WE NEED FOR A SOLID
ENERGY PROGRAM THAT YOU WOULD
SUPPORT IN THE SENATE?
3QUé NECESITAMOS PARA UN
PROGRAMA DE ENERGíA SóLIDO QUé
WE NEED A BALANCED
UD. APOYARíA EN EL SENADO?
LONG-TERM ENERGY PLAN FOR THIS
COUNTRY THAT INCREASES
AMERICAN ENERGY AND ALSO --
[INAUDIBLE ]
NECESITAMOS UN PLAN DE ENERGíA
A LARGO PLAZO EQUILIBRADO PARA
ESTE PAíS QUE AUMENTA LA
ENERGíA AMERICANA Y TAMBIéN
NEW MEXICO HAS COAL, OIL,
NATURAL GAS, URANIUM, WIND,
ALL OF THOSE THINGS WE SHOULD
DO TO MAKE SURE WE HAVE A LOW
COST OF SUPPLY AND HIGH
ENERGY.
CONGRESSMAN HEINRICH VOTED FOR
Y ENERGíA ALTA.
A BILL THAT COST 11,000 JOBS
IN NEW MEXICO AND INCREASED
COSTS BY $11,000 AND SAID IN
HEINRICH DE CONGRESISTA VOTó
POR UN PROYECTO DE LEY QUE QUE
CUESTAN 11000 EMPLEOS EN NEW
MEXICO Y GASTOS AUMENTADOS EN
THE JOURNAL THAT" COAL IS A
$11000 Y DIJERON EN
THING OF THE PAST ".
EL DIARIO QUE "EL CARBóN ES UNA
IF YOU BELIEVE THAT, YOU ARE
COSA DEL PASADO
TELLING THE SENIORS THAT COAL
IS --
SI UD. BELIEVE QUE, USTED DICE
I COULDN'T DISAGREE MORE.
A LOS SENIORS QUE EL CARBóN
LET'S START WITH THE ISSUE OF
GLOBAL WARMING.
DéJENOS COMENZAR CON LA
CUESTIóN DEL RECALENTAMIENTO
I BELIEVE IN SCIENCE SO THE
GLOBAL.
RESPONSIBLE, MORAL THING TO DO
YO BELIEVE EN CIENCIA TAN EL
RESPONSABLE,
IS TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT.
LA COSA MORAL DE HACER ES HACER
THAT LEGISLATION WOULD HAVE
ALGO EN CUANTO A ELLO.
CREATED THOUSANDS OF JOBS IN
THE FIELD.
AQUELLA LEGISLACIóN HABRíA
CREADO MILES DE EMPLEOS EN EL
CAMPO.
WE DO NEED A BALANCED ENERGY
PORTFOLIO AND MOVE FROM THE
THINGS THAT ARE TRADITIONAL
AND THAT WE HAVE PRODUCED IN
SOME CASES FOR OVER A HUNDRED
YEARS OVER TIME TO MORE AND
REALMENTE NECESITAMOS UNA
CARPETA DE ENERGíA EQUILIBRADA
Y NOS MOVEMOS DE LAS COSAS QUE
SON TRADICIONALES Y QUE HEMOS
MORE DOMESTIC AND CLEAN
SOURCES.
PRODUCIDO EN ALGUNOS CASOS PARA
UTILIZING NATURAL GAS FOR SOME
OF THAT MAKES A LOT OF SENSE.
LA UTILIZACIóN DEL GAS NATURAL
PARA UN POCO DE ESTO TIENE
NEW MEXICO HAS AN ENORMOUS
MUCHO SENTIDO.
AMOUNT OF NATURAL GAS, THE
NEW MEXICO TIENE UNA CANTIDAD
PRICE IS VERY LOW AND SO LOW
ENORME DE GAS NATURAL,
THAT PEOPLE ARE SHUTTING THEIR
WELLS HERE.
EL PRECIO ES BAJO Y TAN BAJO
QUE LA GENTE CIERRA SUS POZOS
WE CAN PRODUCE ELECTRICITY
AQUí.
CHEAPLY AND CLEANER THAN
COAL-FIRED GENERATION BY
INVESTING IN THAT.
PODEMOS PRODUCIR LA
ELECTRICIDAD BARATO Y EL
ENCARGADO DE LIMPIEZA QUE LA
GENERACIóN DE FUEGO DE CARBóN
WE COULD ALSO USE IT TO
INVIRTIENDO EN ESTO.
REPLACE OPEC OIL THAT WE
CURRENTLY IMPORT IF WE PASSED
THE NATURAL GAS ACT AND NEED
TAMBIéN PODRíAMOS USARLO PARA
SUSTITUIR EL PETRóLEO DE OPEC
TO CONTINUE TO INVEST IN SOLAR
QUE ACTUALMENTE IMPORTAMOS SI
PASáRAMOS EL ACTO DE GAS
NATURAL.
AND WIND AND EFFICIENCY AND
THINGS LIKE GEOTHERMAL.
Y NECESIDAD DE SEGUIR
70% OF THE ELECTRICITY IN
INVIRTIENDO EN SOLAR Y VIENTO
Y EFICACIA Y COSAS COMO
GEOTéRMICO.
THIS STATE COMES FROM
CLEAN-FIRED COAL GENERATION.
IF COAL IS A THING OF THE
EL 70 % DE LA ELECTRICIDAD EN
ESTE ESTADO VIENE DE LA
GENERACIóN DE CARBóN DE FUEGO
LIMPIA.
SI EL CARBóN ES UNA COSA DEL
PASADO,
PAST, THEN ALL THE MINERS IN
SAN JUAN COUNTY HAVE TO
BELIEVE THEIR JOBS ARE A THING
OF THE PAST.
YOU CAN GO DO YOUR GREEN THING
TODOS LOS MINEROS EN SAN JUAN
COUNTY TIENEN BELIEVE SUS
EMPLEOS SON UNA COSA DEL
PASADO.
BUT I AM GOING TO SUPPORT THE
UD. PUEDE IR HACEN SU COSA
PEOPLE HERE RIGHT NOW.
VERDE.
PERO VOY A APOYAR A LA GENTE
AQUí AHORA.
WE HAVE HAD A SPURT OF NATURAL
GAS PRODUCTION AND THAT IS
GREAT BUT WHEN THE COST OF
ENERGY IS HIGH, JOBS GO
SOMEWHERE ELSE.
PERO CUANDO EL COSTO DE ENERGíA
ES DROGADO,
LOS EMPLEOS VAN EN OTRA PARTE.
I THINK WE NEED A POLICY THAT
KEEPS COST OF ENERGY LOW SO
THAT JOBS STAY HERE IN THE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
I AGREE WE NEED TO KEEP
ESTOY DE ACUERDO QUE TENEMOS
ENERGY COSTS LOW BUT THAT
QUE GUARDAR GASTOS DE ENERGíA
BAJO.
DOESN'T MEAN GIVING POLLUTERS
FREE REIN AND I DO THINK WHEN
YOU LOOK AT THE JOBS WE HAVE
TODAY, WE OWE IT TO EVERYONE,
WHETHER ON AN OIL DERRICK,
DRILLING FOR NATURAL GAS,
WHETHER A MINER IN THE COAL
FIELDS, WE OWE IT TO THEM TO
HAVE JOBS IN THE FUTURE.
WE HAVE SEEN THIS NEW TEA
HEMOS VISTO ESTE NUEVO TEA PARTY
PARTY -- REPUBLICAN PARTY TAKE
OVER THE HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES AND TURN THEIR
BACKS ON THE JOBS OF THE
FUTURE.
THIS NEEDS TO BE A SMOOTH
EL PARTIDO REPUBLICANO ASUME LA
CáMARA DE REPRESENTANTES Y
GIRA SUS ESPALDAS EN LOS
TRANSITION FROM THE THINGS WE
EMPLEOS DEL FUTURO.
KNOW WELL TO THE THINGS THAT
ARE GOING TO BE POWERING ALL
OF OUR POWER NEEDS IN THE
LONG-TERM FUTURE.
YOU CAN'T DO THAT OVERNIGHT
ESTO TIENE QUE SER UNA
TRANSICIóN LISA DE LAS COSAS
QUE SABEMOS BIEN A LAS COSAS
AND YOU NEED IT WITH A SMOOTH
QUE VAN A IMPULSA TODO NUESTRO
TRANSITION THAT PROVIDES JOBS.
WE NEED TO SHOW LEADERSHIP ON
THAT.
MY OPPONENT HAS SHOWN GREAT
UD. NO PUEDE HACER ESTO DURANTE
LA NOCHE Y USTED LO NECESITA
CON UNA TRANSICIóN LISA QUE
LEADERSHIP ON THE KEYSTONE
PROPORCIONA EMPLEOS.
PIPELINE, SOMETHING THAT WOULD
CREATE JOBS IN CANADA.
I HAVE BEEN WORKING TO MAKE
SURE WE BUILD THE SANDIA POWER
LINE SO WE CANNOT ONLY PUT
CONSTRUCTION WORKERS TO WORK
IN NEW MEXICO TO BUILD THE
INFRASTRUCTURE AND THE
TRANSMISSION BUT AFTERWARDS,
TENGO TRABAJA PARA ASEGURARSE
QUE CONSTRUIMOS SANDIA LíNEA
ELéCTRICA ENTONCES SóLO NO
PODEMOS PONER A OBREROS DE LA
CONSTRUCCIóN PARA TRABAJAR EN
ALL THE JOBS THAT WILL COME
NEW MEXICO
ALONG IN TERMS OF WIND AND
Y LA TRANSMISIóN.
SOLAR GENERATION.
FINAL COMMENTS ON THIS?
PERO DESPUéS, TODOS LOS EMPLEOS
QUE LLEGARáN A LO LARGO EN
WE SHOULD BUILD THE
TéRMINOS DE VIENTO Y
GENERACIóN SOLAR.
KEYSTONE PIPELINE BECAUSE IT
GIVES US A FUTURE COARSE OF
ENERGY FROM CANADA AND
OTHERWISE, THEY WILL SELL THAT
DEBERíAMOS CONSTRUIR LA TUBERíA
TO THE CHINESE.
DE CLAVE PORQUE NOS DA UN
FUTURO GRUESO DE LA ENERGíA DE
CANADá Y
ELLOS VENDERáN ESTO A LOS
CHINOS.
I THINK WE SHOULD HAVE JOBS IN
AMERICA, LOW-COST JOBS IN
AMERICA.
YOU ARE A GREEN ENERGY GUY AND
THAT IS MUCH MORE EXPENSIVE
AND NO PERSON LOOKS AT HOW
MUCH GREEN ENERGY WE CAN GET
FROM SOLAR, FROM WIND,
GEOTHERMAL AND GETS TO THE
LEVEL OF ANYTHING WE NEED.
UD. ES UN HOMBRE DE ENERGíA
VERDE Y ES MUCHO MáS CARO Y
NINGUNAS MIRADAS DE PERSONA DE
WE ARE PUTTING PEOPLE TO
CUANTA ENERGíA VERDE PODEMOS
PONERNOS
DEL VIENTO, GEOTéRMICO Y SE
PONE AL NIVEL DE ALGO QUE
WORK HERE IN THE STATE OF NEW
NECESITAMOS.
MEXICO --
[OVERLAPPING SPEAKERS]
SO THE QUESTION IS WHO IS
GOING TO STAND UP WHEN IT
COMES TIME TO TAKE THOSE
SUBSIDIES AWAY FROM THE
BIGGEST OIL COMPANIES IN THE
WORLD AND PUT THEM TO WORK IN
EL ENTONCES QUE LA PREGUNTA ES
THE JOBS IN THE FUTURE?
QUIéN VA A SER DE PIES CUANDO
ESTO VIENE EL TIEMPO PARA
LLEVARSE AQUELLAS SUBVENCIONES
DE LAS COMPAñíAS PETROLERAS
MáS GRANDES
I AM GOING TO STAND UP TO
EXXON-MOBIL AND
CONOCO-PHILLIPS AND MY
OPPONENT IS NOT.
VOY A SER DE PIES A EXXON MOBIL
Y PHILLIPS CONOCO Y MI
LET'S TO GO EMIGRATION.
OPOSITOR NO ES.
WHAT SHE -- SHOULD WE DO WITH
THE 12 MILLION PEOPLE IN THIS
COUNTRY ILLEGALLY.
SI HACEMOS CON LAS 12 MILLONES
DE PERSONAS EN ESTE PAíS
WE SHOULD HAVE A PROCESS
ILEGALMENTE.
THAT PUTS THEM THROUGH A
HOMELAND SECURITY BACKGROUND
CHECK.
ANYONE INVOLVED IN CRIMINAL
ACTIVITY, THEY NEED TO BE
DEPORTED.
FOR THOSE PEOPLE WHOSE ONLY
TRANSAGGRESSION IS THEIR
STATUS, AT THE SHOULD BE ABLE
PARA AQUELLA GENTE CU SóLO LA
AGRESIóN DE TRANSACCIóN ES SU
TO GET AT THE END OF THE LINE
ESTADO
EN DEBER SER ABLE PARA PONERSE
AL FINAL DE LíNEA Y ENTRAR EN
AND GET INTO THE LEGAL
EL LEGAL
EMMIGRATION SYSTEM.
THAT SAID, WE HAVE A
SISTEMA DE MIGRACIóN DE EM
RESPONSIBILITY TO THE KIDS WHO
CAME HERE NOT OF THEIR OWN
ESTO DIJO, TENEMOS UNA
VOLITION, WHO GREW UP IN
RESPONSABILIDAD A LOS NIñOS
QUE VINIERON AQUí NO DE SU
PROPIA VOLICIóN,
AMERICA AND TO WANT BECOME A
DOCTOR, A PHYSICIANS, AN
QUIéN CRECIó EN AMERICA Y
QUERER SE HACE UN DOCTOR,
ENGINEER, AND THEY WANT TO
GIVE BACK TO THIS COUNTRY AND
I WOULD ASK MY OPPONENT IS SHE
WILLING TO VOTE FOR THE DREAM
ACT?
UNOS MéDICOS, UN INGENIERO, Y
ELLOS QUIEREN DEVOLVER A ESTE
PAíS Y YO PEDIRíA QUE MI
WITH RESPECT TO THE
OPOSITOR SEA ELLA COMPLACIENTE
A VOTAR POR
EMMIGRATION I AM --
LET'S EXPLAIN WHAT THE
AGREEMENT ACT IS FIRST.
IT IS THE LITTLE KIDS WHO
ONLY KNOW THIS COUNTRY, IF
SON LOS PEQUEñOS NIñOS QUE SóLO
SABEN ESTE PAíS,
THEY ARE WILLING TO GET A
SI ELLOS QUIEREN CONSEGUIR UNA
ENSEñANZA SUPERIOR,
HIGHER EDUCATION, IN -- ENLIFT N
THE MILITARY --
EN ASCENSOR EN LOS MILITARES
THERE HAVE BEEN A NUMBER OF
DREAM ACTS THROUGH THE YEARS.
HUBO VARIAS ACCIONES DE SUEñO
DURANTE LOS AñOS.
IF HE WANTED THE DREAM ACT,
SI éL QUISIERA DREAM ACT,
ELLOS TENíAN 2 AñOS
THEY HAD TWO YEARS TO DO THE
EMMIGRATION REFORM AND DIDN'T.
HACER LA REFORMA DE MIGRACIóN
EM Y NO HACER
I THINK WE NEED CHANGES TO OUR
LAWS BECAUSE I DON'T THINK
THEY BENEFIT THE UNITED STATES
OF AMERICA.
AND RIGHT NOW, THERE IS A
PIENSO QUE NECESITAMOS CAMBIOS
EN NUESTRAS LEYES PORQUE NO
PIENSO QUE ELLOS BENEFICIAN
LOTTERY TO DETERMINE A LOT OF
LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMERICA.
VISAS TO COME TO AMERICA AND I
THINK WE SHOULD DO IT BASED ON
EDUCATION, ABILITIES, DESIRE
Y AHORA, HAY UNA LOTERíA PARA
TO WORK HARD AND THOSE KINDS
DETERMINAR MUCHOS VISADOS PARA
VENIR A AMERICA Y PIENSO QUE
DEBERíAMOS HACERLO BASADO
OF THINGS FOR PEOPLE COMING TO
THE UNITED STATES.
WITH RESPECT TO CHILDREN, AND
THIS CAME TO MY ATTENTION WHEN
ONE OF MY COLLEAGUES HAD KIDS
NOMINATED TO GO TO THE NAVAL
ACADEMY AND SHE DIDN'T FIND
OUT THAT HER PARENTS BROUGHT
CON RESPECTO A NIñOS, Y ESTO
VINO A MI ATENCIóN CUANDO UNO
DE MIS COLEGAS HIZO DENOMINAR
HER HERE WHEN SHE WAS 3 MONTHS
A NIñOS PARA IR A NAVAL
ACADEMY.
OLD AND NEVER KNEW SHE WAS NOT
AN AMERICAN CITIZEN.
Y ELLA NO DESCUBRIó QUE SUS
PADRES TRAJERON SU E CUANDO
ELLA TENíA 3 MESES Y NUNCA
WE NEED TO FIND A PERMANENT
SABíA QUE ELLA NO ERA UN
AMERICANO
SOLUTION FOR THOSE KIDS.
MARK ARUBIO WAS WORKING ON A
PERMANENT SOLUTION FOR THOSE
KIDS WHEN IT WAS DERAILED BY
THE PROSECUTORIAL
LEGISLATION --
WE COULD GO ON AND ON WITH
ARUBA DE SEñAL INFLUíA EN UNA
SOLUCIóN PERMANENTE PARA
AQUELLOS NIñOS CUANDO FUE
THAT BUT I DO WANT TO TALK
HECHA DESCARRILAR POR LA
LEGISLACIóN PROSECUTORIAL
ABOUT DEFENSE.
PODRíAMOS GO ON Y EN CON ESTO.
WE'RE LOOKING AT SEVERE CUTS
IN DEFENSE WITH
SEQUESTRATIONMENT ASSUMING WE
GET TO AN AREA WHERE WE WILL
WORK THIS OUT, WHAT IS VALID
FOR DEFENSE, WHAT IS NOT VALID
MIRAMOS REDUCCIONES SEVERAS EN
LA DEFENSA CON
SEQUESTRATION+MENT QUE SUPONE
QUE NOS PONGAMOS A UN áREA
FOR DEFENSE IN YOUR VIEW AS A
SENATOR?
DONDE RESOLVEREMOS ESTO
I AGREE WE'RE IN DEEP
3QUé ES VáLIDO PARA LA DEFENSA,
QUé NO ES VáLIDO PARA LA
TROUBLE AND THE SECRETARY OF
DEFENSA EN SU VISTA COMO UN
SENADOR?
DEFENSE HAS SAID THAT THIS
PROCESS THAT CONGRESSMAN
HEINRICH SUPPORTED AND VOTED
FOR.
AND I WOULD SAY THAT THE
CONGRESSMAN IN NORTHERN MEXICO
DID NOT SUPPORT THAT BILL.
Y YO DIRíA QUE EL CONGRESISTA
YOU, DID YOU VOTED FOR IT AND
EN MéXICO DEL NORTE NO APOYó
ESTO BILL CUENTA .
AT THE TIME, I EXPRESSED MY
SEVERE CONCERN AND RESERVATION
BECAUSE OF THE IMPACT ON THE
DEFENSE.
WE MAY BE GOING TO A NAVY THAT
IS THE SIZE IT WAS IN 1915, AN
PODEMOS IR A UN NAVY QUE ES EL
ARMY AND MARINE CORPS THAT WAS
TAMAñO QUE ERA EN 1915
THE SIZE IT WAS IN PEARL
HARBOR.
UN ARMY Y MARINE CORPS QUE ERA
EL TAMAñO ESTABA EN PEARL
HARBOR.
THIS HAS TO BE TURNED AROUND.
WITH RESPECT WITH THE
MILITARY, I BELIEVE WE NEED TO
LEAD IN THE WORLD AND PROTECT
OUR VITAL NATIONAL INTERESTS
IN THE WORLD AND THAT U.S.
CON EL RESPETO CON LOS
FORCES SHOULD ONLY GO INTO
MILITARES, YO BELIEVE TENEMOS
QUE CONDUCIR EN EL MUNDO Y
PROTEGER NUESTROS INTERESES
NACIONALES VITALES AL
MUNDO.
HARM'S WAY TO PROTECT
AMERICA'S VITAL INTERESTS.
Y AQUELLOS ESTADOS UNIDOS. LAS
FUERZAS SóLO DEBERíAN ENTRAR
LET'S START AT THE END OF
EN EL MODO DEL DAñO DE
THAT.
PROTEGER AMERICA ES INTERESES
VITALES.
DéJENOS COMENZAR AL FINAL DE
TEN YEARS AGO YESTERDAY,
ESTO.
CONGRESSWOMAN WILSON VOTED TO
SEND AMERICANS IN HARM'S WAY
IN IRAQ IN A CONFLICT THAT WAS
HACE 10 AñOS AYER, WILSON DE
CONGRESISTA VOTó PARA ENVIAR A
AMERICANOS DEL MODO DEL DAñO
EN IRAQ EN UN CONFLICTO QUE
FUE MANEJADO EN GRAN PARTE
DRIVEN LARGELY BY SPLIT --
POR HENDIDURA
POLITICIZED CONFLICT.
CONFLICTO POLITIZADO.
JOHN McCAIN WAS AGAINST IT
BECAUSE THE DEBT WAS
DEVASTATING FOR OUR COUNTRY.
I FAVOR THE BALANCED APPROACH
TO ADD BOTH CUTS AND REVENUE.
FAVOREZCO EL ACERCAMIENTO
MORE FUNDAMENTALLY, HOW DO WE
EQUILIBRADO PARA AñADIR TANTO
REDUCCIONES COMO INGRESOS.
PROTECT OUR SITUATION HERE IN
NEW MEXICO VERSUS ALL OF THE
OTHERS AND HAVE A LONG-TERM
FUTURE?
3MáS FUNDAMENTALMENTE, CóMO
PROTEGEMOS NUESTRA SITUACIóN
AND THERE IS A LOT TO BE
AQUí EN NEW MEXICO CONTRA
TODOS LOS DEMáS Y TENEMOS UN
FUTURO A LARGO PLAZO?
LEARNED BY WHAT HAPPENED AT
CANNON AND KIRTLAND AIR FORCE
BASE.
IT IS ABOUT FINDING THE
MISSION OF THE FUTURE.
ES SOBRE EL DESCUBRIMIENTO DE
THERE IS NO WAY TO DEFEND
LA MISIóN DEL FUTURO.
SOMETHING THAT WAS IMPORTANT
30 YEARS AGO AND ISN'T AS
IMPORTANT TODAY.
BUT IF YOU HAVE THOSE MISSIONS
NO HAY NINGúN MODO DE DEFENDER
ALGO QUE ERA IMPORTANTE HACE
IN THE FUTURE AT OUR
30 AñOS Y NO ES TAN IMPORTANTE
HOY.
INSTALLATION, YOU CAN DEFEND
THEM BECAUSE PEOPLE BELIEVE IN
OUR NATIONAL DEFENSE.
WHICHEVER OF YOU WINS, YOU
WILL HAVE NO SENIORITY GOING
INTO THE SENATE AND NEW MEXICO
SENATORS USED TO HAVE A LOT OF
SENIORITY AND WERE
INSTRUMENTAL IN PROTECTING THE
BASES AND THE LABS.
CUALQUIER DE USTEDES GANA, UD.
NO TENDRá NINGUNA PRECEDENCIA
QUE ENTRA EN EL SENADO Y LOS
SENADORES DE NEW MEXICO SOLíAN
HOW DO YOU PROPOSE TO DO THAT
TENER MUCHA PRECEDENCIA
Y CONTRIBUYERON DECISIVAMENTE A
LA PROTECCIóN DE LAS BASES Y
WITH LITTLE SENIORITY?
LOS LABORATORIOS.
WE ONLY HAVE ABOUT A MINUTE
LEFT AND WE WILL START WITH
YOU MS. WILSON.
HE SIDO
I HAVE BEEN TAKING THAT ON
INCIDENT -- SINCE I BEGAN.
WITH RESPECT TO THE BASIS, WE
NEED STRONG MISSIONS AND
INFRASTRUCTURE AND BEING AN
CON RESPECTO A LA BASE,
NECESITAMOS MISIONES FUERTES E
ADVOCATE FOR THOSE BASES.
INFRAESTRUCTURA Y SER UN
ABOGADO PARA AQUELLAS BASES.
WHEN YOU LET F-16 AIRCRAFT GO
TO VERMONT, THAT IS NOT
PROTECTING THEM.
I REMEMBER SOMEBODY ASKED
ME THIS A LITTLE DIFFERENT IN
2008 WHEN THEY WERE ASKING
ABOUT A LAWMAKER IN THE HOUSE.
RECUERDO QUE ALGUIEN ME
PREGUNTó ESTO UN POCO
DIFERENTE EN 2008 CUANDO ELLOS
I SAID I AM NOT GOING TO WAIT
PREGUNTABAN SOBRE UN
LEGISLADOR EN LA CASA.
IN THE BACK AND WAIT TO RAISE
MY HAND WHEN THEY SAY I CAN
RAISE MY HAND.
I WILL GO OUT AND FIGHT FOR
DIJE QUE NO VOY A ESPERAR EN LA
NEW MEXICO JOBS FROM DAY ONE.
ESPALDA Y ESPERAR A LEVANTAR
MI MANO CUANDO ELLOS DICEN QUE
PUEDO LEVANTAR MI MANO.
SALDRé Y PELEARé POR EMPLEOS DE
FOR OUR BASES, FOR OUR LABS.
NEW MEXICO A PARTIR DEL DíA